Policy Brief
Ensuring Adequate Provision of Mental Health Services
for Students in Universities
A policy brief advocating for prospective measures to ensure
that the counsellor to student ratio in universities in England and Wales more
closely aligns with student demand and need.
To be presented as the following question: What measures can be taken by the Department
of Education to ensure there is sufficient access to adequately resourced
mental health services by students in universities in the event of an electoral
victory for the Labour Party in the next United Kingdom (UK) general election?
For the attention of Angela Rayner, Shadow Secretary of
State for Education


Word Count: 1,060
I.
Executive Summary
Universities in England and Wales
are widely falling short of the mark in the provision of sufficient mental
health services to students in higher education under the jurisdiction of the
current government. Currently, counselling services at universities are
stretched and understaffed and are thus failing to provide adequate support to students
in higher education who are increasingly
reporting mental health problems; research from YouGov found that one in four students suffer from mental
health problems. (YouGov, 2016) Furthermore, students in higher education are less likely than a member of the general
population to seek help, and thus a revision of the current system to
ensure the provision of effective mental health services in universities is
essential to ensure that support is available when sought.
Upon election, the Department of
Education is recommended to:
·
Ensure
mental health services at universities are adequately staffed and resourced
·
Ensure
students are made aware of and are able to access such services
·
Adjust
funding for counselling services when required by changes in student population
or demand for services
II.
Situation Brief
Research conducted by the Institute
of Employment Studies and Researching Equity, Access and Participation for the current
government found that among studied institutions there was ‘an overwhelming
consensus that demand for mental health provision was rising’ with increasing
numbers of students disclosing an increasingly varied array of conditions
before arrival. (IES, REAP, 2015) Furthermore, research by the Institute for
Public Policy Research found that a record
number of students died as a result of suicide in 2015, reporting a 79%
increase in such deaths from 2007 to 2015, as well as a 210% increase in drop-outs attributed
to mental health problems from the 2009/10 academic year to 2014/15. (IPPR,
2017)

Coinciding with these drastic
deteriorations in student suicides and dropout rates is a chronic understaffing
of mental health support services within universities. Research by Brown for
the Higher Education Policy Institute (HEPI) found that a counsellor to student
ratio of around 1:1,358 would be required on average to meet the requirements
of students for a 26-week year; the
ratio that exists in actuality being 1:5,000, three to four times lower than
the estimated requirement. (Brown, 2016)
The widespread understaffing of
university counselling services in the face of such concerning statistics is
evidence of the current government’s failure
to effectively address this issue. Tackling this issue directly would help
to fulfil the Labour Party’s 2017 manifesto promise of ‘increasing the
proportion of mental health budgets spent on support for children and young people.’
(The Labour Party Manifesto, 2017, p.73)
III.
Policy Options
Policy Option A – direct funding of a sufficient counsellor to student
ratio
The vitality of sufficiently funded
counselling services to improve mental health outcomes in students in
universities is highlighted in MacAskill’s research on student mental health in
the UK, where she explains with regards to that ‘lecturers may not be
sufficiently sensitized to these issues…counselling
services may have an additional role to play in developing awareness of the
mental health needs of students.’ (MacAskill, 2012, p.16)
An article for Times Higher
Education highlights that ‘government funding cuts could force universities to
make “increasingly tough decisions about who and what they can support”’,
echoing the sentiments of the Vice President for Welfare of the National Union
of Students that support services were ‘creaking at the seams.’ (Havergal,
2016) The creation of a budget to proportionally
allocate funds to universities exclusively for the purposes of ensuring that a
sufficient number of counsellors are employed to meet the needs of the
student population would directly address this issue of understaffing and
prevent its recurrence if maintained.
Policy Option B – incorporation of mental health support quality into
the Teaching Excellence and Student Outcomes Framework (TEF)
An alternative option to improve
the counsellor to student ratio in universities in England and Wales would be
to incentivise universities to allocate existing funds by incorporating the
quality of a university’s counselling services into their evaluation on the
TEF. The aforementioned research from the Institute for Public Policy Research details
that when universities ‘do not respond to the challenge of student mental health
effectively, they risk incurring
reputational damage.’ (IPPR, ibid., p.37)
Brown’s research describes how
academics have been incentivised to increase their research output and improve
the quality of their teaching by the establishment of the TEF. Thus,
establishing a distinct category which evaluates the extent of provision of
counselling services as part of this framework could incentivise universities
to improve in this regard.
IV.
Recommendation
This policy brief has outlined the significant
discrepancy between counsellor to student ratios in UK universities and the
needs of students at modern day universities who are increasingly disclosing
mental health conditions. Furthermore, the sharp increase in suicides and
dropouts among students due to mental health in recent years outlines the need
to take action to ensure that there is a sufficient number of counsellors at
every university to deal with and mitigate this crisis.
It is recommended that in the event
of the Labour Party’s election to government, the Department of Education pursues
Policy Option A, to allocate a
proportional budget which directly funds a counsellor to student ratio which
matches student need. The political feasibility of this option is highlighted in
the aforementioned manifesto promise of the Labour Party to increase the funds
allocated to mental health services for young people. The technical feasibility
of this option stems from the cost-effectiveness of directly assuring effective
mental health support in universities by
preventing dropouts and increasing
returns on public investment. (West, 2015) Furthermore, the Head of
Counselling at Brunel University London estimated that the service saved the university £2.5 million (Brown,
ibid., p.12) and an in-depth study the impact of counselling on academic
outcomes found that ‘81 percent of
students considered counselling to have helped them stay at university.’
(Wallace, 2012)
The need for direct and immediate
action to ensure counselling services are adequately staffed is clear. The
rapid increase in students reporting mental health conditions in recent years
coupled with deteriorations in dropout rates and suicides means that
reputational incentives are insufficiently reliable when the educational
prospects, day-to-day emotional wellbeing and most crucially lives of students
are being compromised by a lack of funding. Thus, it is recommended that the
Department of Education directly provides universities with the necessary funds
to achieve equitable counsellor to student ratios in universities in England
and Wales.
V.
Key Sources
Aronin, S. and Smith, M. (2016) One in four students suffer from mental health problems. YouGov. Available: https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/obtomdatp4/Survey_Results.pdf.
Establishes the salience of
the policy problem and informed the executive summary by:
· Providing quantitative
data highlighting the prevalence of mental health conditions among students in
UK universities
Brown, P. (2016) The invisible problem? Improving
students' mental health. 88. Oxford: Available: https://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/STRICTLY-EMBARGOED-UNTIL-22-SEPT-Hepi-Report-88-FINAL.pdf.
Informed both
prospective policy options, the recommendation and the situation brief by:
·
Highlighting the link between lack
of funding for counselling services and reduced student wellbeing
·
Presenting research which makes
clear the extent of understaffing of university counselling services
·
Detailing the reputational incentive
structure that currently exists for academic and teaching quality in
universities in England and Wales
MacAskill,
A. (2012) The mental health of university students in the United Kingdom. British
Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 41 (4) Available: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/6449/1/Macaskill_University_students.pdf.Informed Policy Option A and the situation brief by:
· Providing an in-depth quantitative study
detailing the prevalence of mental health problems across academic years
· Detailing the need for a well-funded,
adequately staffed counselling service at universities in the UK due to the inability
of other figures at university such as lecturers to fulfil this role
· Highlighting the comparative reluctance of
students to seek help for mental health problems, demonstrating the necessity
of an effective counselling service to reach out to this vulnerable group
Thorley,
C. (2017) Not by Degrees: Improving Student Mental Health in the UK's
Universities. London: Institute for Public Policy Research. Available: https://www.ippr.org/files/2017-09/1504645674_not-by-degrees-170905.pdf.Informed both policy options, the situation brief and the recommendation by:
· Providing long-term, detailed studies
which document the sharp increases in student suicides and dropout rates
· Detailing the damage to reputation that
universities can incur when they fail to effectively address student mental
health
Williams, M., Coare, P., Marvell,
R., Pollard, E., Houghton, D.A. and Anderson, J. (2015) Understanding
provision for students with mental health problems and intensive support
needs. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies; Researching Equity,
Access and Participation. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20180319114953/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rereports/year/2015/mh/.
Informed the situation brief
by:
· Providing an
in-depth, multi-university study which highlights a universal acknowledgement
of increased demand for effective mental health services
· Highlighting the
increasing number of students reporting a wider array of mental health
conditions
VI.
Additional Sources
Burnett, K. (2017) By creating a market for universities, the government has snookered itself. The Guardian, . Available: https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2017/sep/07/by-creating-a-market-for-universities-the-government-has-snookered-itself.
Dandridge, N. (2015) Student
mental wellbeing in higher education: good practice guide. London:
Universities UK. Available: https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2015/student-mental-wellbeing-in-he.pdf.
Havergal, C. (2016) Student
mental health: fresh spike in problems reported. Times Higher
Education, . Available: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/student-mental-health-fresh-spike-problems-reported
The
Labour Party (2017) The Labour Party Manifesto 2017. London:
Potts Print. Available: https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/labour-manifesto-2017.pdf.Wallace, P. (2012) The impact of counselling on academic outcomes: the student perspective. University and College Counselling, Available: https://www.bacp.co.uk/bacp-journals/university-and-college-counselling/november-2012/the-impact-of-counselling-on-academic-outcomes/.
West, S. (2015) Support
Student Mental Wellbeing: Policy, Practice and Future Directions. Bristol:
Universities UK. Available: http://www2.uwe.ac.uk/services/Marketing/about-us/pdf/VC-speeches/Supporting-Student-Mental-Wellbeing-Policy-Practice-and-Future-Directions.pdf.
Comments
Post a Comment